2004 Renault Scenic vs. 1972 Volvo 1800
To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 1800 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Volvo 1800 (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2004 Renault Scenic. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Volvo 1800 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic weights approximately 514 kg more than 1972 Volvo 1800.
Because 1972 Volvo 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Volvo 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Volvo 1800 (176 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 1972 Volvo 1800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Renault Scenic | 1972 Volvo 1800 | |
| Make | Renault | Volvo |
| Model | Scenic | 1800 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1704 kg | 1190 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2460 mm |
