2004 Riley MR II vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Riley MR II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Riley MR II would be higher. At 7,994 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Riley MR II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1276 kg more than 2004 Riley MR II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Riley MR II | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Riley | Jeep |
| Model | MR II | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 6400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 459 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 2336 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2156 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2916 mm |
