2004 Rolls-Royce 100 vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 would be higher. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 weights approximately 949 kg more than 2010 Dodge Ram.
Because 2010 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Dodge |
| Model | 100 | Ram |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8998 cc | 5654 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2640 kg | 1691 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3480 mm | 3560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 98 L |
