2004 Rolls-Royce 100 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 would be higher. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 weights approximately 765 kg more than 2013 Jaguar XF.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Jaguar |
| Model | 100 | XF |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8998 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.6 mm | 93 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2640 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3480 mm | 2909 mm |
