2004 Rover 25 vs. 1979 Seat Ritmo

To start off, 2004 Rover 25 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Rover 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 25 (101 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1979 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 25 should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 25 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1979 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 25 (245 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Seat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Rover 25 1979 Seat Ritmo
Make Rover Seat
Model 25 Ritmo
Year Released 2004 1979
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1994 cc 1197 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 101 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 92 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1130 kg 880 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 3950 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2460 mm