2004 Rover 45 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 45. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 45 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2004 Rover 45. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 45. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 517 kg more than 2004 Rover 45. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover 45, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 45. (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Rover 45 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Rover | Cadillac |
Model | 45 | CTS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.7 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1857 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |