2004 Rover 75 vs. 1964 Sunbeam Imp
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Imp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Imp would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 838 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Imp.
Because 1964 Sunbeam Imp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Sunbeam Imp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Rover 75 | 1964 Sunbeam Imp | |
| Make | Rover | Sunbeam |
| Model | 75 | Imp |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 875 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 747 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2090 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 27 L |
