2004 Rover 75 vs. 2002 Acura CL

To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura CL would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 160 kg more than 2002 Acura CL.

Because 2004 Rover 75 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Rover 75. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura CL. (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura CL.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Rover 75 2002 Acura CL
Make Rover Acura
Model 75 CL
Year Released 2004 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4601 cc 3210 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 256 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6900 RPM
Torque 410 Nm 315 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90.3 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 86 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1740 kg 1580 kg
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2580 mm