2004 Rover 75 vs. 2006 Holden UTE
To start off, 2006 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2006 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2006 Holden UTE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden UTE. (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Rover 75 | 2006 Holden UTE | |
Make | Rover | Holden |
Model | 75 | UTE |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1500 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2950 mm |