2004 Rover 75 vs. 2008 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2008 Smart Roadster is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Smart Roadster. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Smart Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Rover 75 | 2008 Smart Roadster | |
| Make | Rover | Smart |
| Model | 75 | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.4 seconds | 10.9 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.4 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
