2004 Rover 75 vs. 2009 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Outlook (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Saturn Outlook weights approximately 180 kg more than 2004 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75. 2009 Saturn Outlook has automatic transmission and 2004 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 2004 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Saturn Outlook will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Rover 75 | 2009 Saturn Outlook | |
| Make | Rover | Saturn |
| Model | 75 | Outlook |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 99.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 83 L |
