2004 Rover 75 vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75.
Because 2010 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Rover 75 | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
| Make | Rover | Nissan |
| Model | 75 | Titan |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 5551 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3560 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.5 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.3 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.4 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
