2004 Rover 75 vs. 2011 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2011 Nissan Frontier is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Frontier (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75.
Because 2011 Nissan Frontier is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Frontier will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Frontier. (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Rover 75 | 2011 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Rover | Nissan |
Model | 75 | Frontier |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 3953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.5 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.3 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |