2004 Rover 75 vs. 2012 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2012 Holden Caprice is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 215 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75.
Because 2012 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75. 2012 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 2004 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 2004 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Rover 75 | 2012 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Rover | Holden |
Model | 75 | Caprice |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1951 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |