2004 Rover 75 vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 1140 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano. 2004 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 2012 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2012 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Rover 75 | 2012 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Rover | Tata |
| Model | 75 | Nano |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.3 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.4 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
