2004 Rover 75 vs. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo
To start off, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,691 cc, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo weights approximately 240 kg more than 2004 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo (510 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Rover 75 | 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo | |
Make | Rover | Maserati |
Model | 75 | Gran Turismo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 4691 cc |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.3 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1980 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2942 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.5 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.3 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |