2004 Rover City vs. 2011 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2011 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover City. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover City would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Cadillac Escalade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Cadillac Escalade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover City, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Rover City | 2011 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Rover | Cadillac |
Model | City | Escalade |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1400 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 403 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 5639 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1892 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3302 mm |