2004 Saab 03-Sep vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Saab 03-Sep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Saab 03-Sep would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 244 more horse power than 2004 Saab 03-Sep. (176 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Saab 03-Sep.
Because 2012 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Saab 03-Sep. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (430 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Saab 03-Sep. (264 Nm). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Saab 03-Sep | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | Saab | Audi |
Model | 03-Sep | R8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 264 Nm | 430 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 90 L |