2004 Saturn ION vs. 2012 Dodge Charger

To start off, 2012 Dodge Charger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Saturn ION. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Saturn ION would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Charger (292 HP) has 151 more horse power than 2004 Saturn ION. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2004 Saturn ION. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Charger weights approximately 549 kg more than 2004 Saturn ION. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Saturn ION, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Charger (352 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Saturn ION. (197 Nm). This means 2012 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Saturn ION.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Saturn ION 2012 Dodge Charger
Make Saturn Dodge
Model ION Charger
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2196 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 141 HP 292 HP
Torque 197 Nm 352 Nm
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1248 kg 1797 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 5077 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1905 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1483 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 3053 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.1 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 9.1 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 72 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]