2004 Saturn L vs. 2000 Saturn SC
To start off, 2004 Saturn L is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Saturn SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Saturn SC would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saturn L (182 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2000 Saturn SC. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 2000 Saturn SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saturn L weights approximately 414 kg more than 2000 Saturn SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saturn L (250 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Saturn SC. (154 Nm). This means 2004 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Saturn SC.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Saturn L | 2000 Saturn SC | |
Make | Saturn | Saturn |
Model | L | SC |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 154 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |