2004 Scion xA vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Scion xA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Scion xA would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2004 Scion xA. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2004 Scion xA.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Scion xA. (142 Nm). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Scion xA.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Scion xA | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Scion | Toyota |
Model | xA | Matrix |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 132 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 173 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.4 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |