2004 Scion xB vs. 2008 Renault Sandero
To start off, 2008 Renault Sandero is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Scion xB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Scion xB would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Scion xB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Scion xB (108 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2008 Renault Sandero. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Scion xB should accelerate faster than 2008 Renault Sandero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Sandero weights approximately 1 kg more than 2004 Scion xB.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Scion xB (142 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Sandero. (112 Nm). This means 2004 Scion xB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Sandero.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Scion xB | 2008 Renault Sandero | |
| Make | Scion | Renault |
| Model | xB | Sandero |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1111 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |
