2004 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2004 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2004 Seat Inca Kombi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Seat Inca Kombi | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Seat | Holden |
| Model | Inca Kombi | Epica |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1391 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1810 mm |
