2004 Seat Toledo vs. 1992 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2004 Seat Toledo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Falcon (161 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2004 Seat Toledo. (99 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2004 Seat Toledo.
Because 1992 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Falcon (311 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Seat Toledo. (149 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Seat Toledo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Seat Toledo | 1992 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Seat | Ford |
Model | Toledo | Falcon |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 311 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2800 mm |