2004 Seat Toledo vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Seat Toledo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Seat Toledo would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Seat Toledo. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2004 Seat Toledo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Seat Toledo (310 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2004 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Seat Toledo | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Seat | Holden |
Model | Toledo | Epica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |