2004 Skoda Fabia vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Skoda Fabia is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2004 Skoda Fabia. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2004 Skoda Fabia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Skoda Fabia weights approximately 45 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Skoda Fabia. (195 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Skoda Fabia.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Skoda Fabia | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Skoda | Triumph |
Model | Fabia | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1420 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |