2004 Smart ForFour vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2004 Smart ForFour is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Smart ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Smart ForFour (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Smart ForFour weights approximately 215 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Smart ForFour | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Smart | Suzuki |
| Model | ForFour | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 115 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2250 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 66 L |
