2004 Smart ForFour vs. 1995 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2004 Smart ForFour is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 1,123 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Smart ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Smart ForFour (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1995 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1995 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Smart ForFour weights approximately 220 kg more than 1995 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Smart ForFour | 1995 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Smart | ZAZ |
| Model | ForFour | Wagon |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1123 cc | 1089 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 67 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2330 mm |
