2004 Smart ForFour vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Smart ForFour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Smart ForFour would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chrysler 200 (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2004 Smart ForFour. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Smart ForFour.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Chrysler 200 has automatic transmission and 2004 Smart ForFour has manual transmission. 2004 Smart ForFour will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Chrysler 200 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Smart ForFour | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Smart | Chrysler |
Model | ForFour | 200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4869 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 64 L |