2004 Smart ForFour vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Smart ForFour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Smart ForFour would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1575 kg more than 2004 Smart ForFour.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Smart ForFour | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Smart | Fisker |
| Model | ForFour | Karma |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 36 L |
