2004 Spyker C8 vs. 2006 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2004 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S60 weights approximately 848 kg more than 2004 Spyker C8.
Because 2004 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Spyker C8 | 2006 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Spyker | Volvo |
Model | C8 | S60 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1984 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 2198 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 70 L |