2004 Spyker C8 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2004 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 380 kg more than 2004 Spyker C8.
Because 2004 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Spyker C8 | 2010 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Spyker | Chevrolet |
| Model | C8 | Captiva |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2405 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 65 L |
