2004 Spyker C8 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 564 kg more than 2004 Spyker C8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Spyker C8 | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Spyker | Cadillac |
Model | C8 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 6200 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 548 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1914 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1884 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 68 L |