2004 Spyker C8 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 1436 kg more than 2004 Spyker C8.
Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Spyker C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Spyker C8 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
| Make | Spyker | Cadillac |
| Model | C8 | ESCALADE |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 6000 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 327 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 2786 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5144 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2007 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1928 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2947 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 95 L |
