2004 SsangYong Musso vs. 2013 Volvo S60

To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 3,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2004 SsangYong Musso. (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2004 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 212 kg more than 2013 Volvo S60.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S60 (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 SsangYong Musso. (210 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 SsangYong Musso.

Compare all specifications:

2004 SsangYong Musso 2013 Volvo S60
Make SsangYong Volvo
Model Musso S60
Year Released 2004 2013
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2295 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line W
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 5 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 247 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 361 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 91 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.4 mm 93 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Acceleration 0-100mph 11.8 seconds 7.5 seconds
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Transmission Type Automatic CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1825 kg 1613 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4628 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 2097 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1484 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2776 mm