2004 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2012 Audi A8
To start off, 2012 Audi A8 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 SsangYong Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 SsangYong Rexton would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A8 (247 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2004 SsangYong Rexton. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 2004 SsangYong Rexton.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A8 (550 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 SsangYong Rexton. (256 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 SsangYong Rexton.
Compare all specifications:
2004 SsangYong Rexton | 2012 Audi A8 | |
Make | SsangYong | Audi |
Model | Rexton | A8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2874 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 256 Nm | 550 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Top Speed | 157 km/hour | 243 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 16.7 seconds | 6.1 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5136 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1948 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2992 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 90 L |