2004 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2012 Audi S8
To start off, 2012 Audi S8 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 SsangYong Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 SsangYong Rexton would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Audi S8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi S8 (513 HP) has 395 more horse power than 2004 SsangYong Rexton. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi S8 should accelerate faster than 2004 SsangYong Rexton.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi S8 (650 Nm) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 SsangYong Rexton. (256 Nm). This means 2012 Audi S8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 SsangYong Rexton.
Compare all specifications:
2004 SsangYong Rexton | 2012 Audi S8 | |
Make | SsangYong | Audi |
Model | Rexton | S8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2874 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 513 HP |
Torque | 256 Nm | 650 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 157 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 16.7 seconds | 4.2 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1948 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2992 mm |