2004 Subaru Outback vs. 1989 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Subaru Outback (212 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1989 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Subaru Outback | 1989 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Subaru | Ford |
| Model | Outback | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4690 mm |
