2004 Subaru Outback vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura CL would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Subaru Outback (165 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1997 Acura CL. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura CL weights approximately 24 kg more than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Acura CL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Subaru Outback | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Subaru | Acura |
Model | Outback | CL |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2457 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 145 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1556 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |