2004 Subaru Outback vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2004 Subaru Outback. (212 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Toyota Tundra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Subaru Outback. (285 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Subaru Outback | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Subaru | Toyota |
| Model | Outback | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |
