2004 Subaru Outback vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Subaru Outback. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2004 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 224 kg more than 2004 Subaru Outback. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Subaru Outback. (225 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Subaru Outback | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Subaru | Chevrolet |
| Model | Outback | Equinox |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2457 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 225 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 98 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1556 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2857 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 71 L |
