2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara (165 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2010 Acura CSX. (155 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara should accelerate faster than 2010 Acura CSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara weights approximately 97 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara (220 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Acura CSX. (188 Nm). This means 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Acura CSX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Suzuki | Acura |
Model | Grand Vitara | CSX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 188 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |