2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs. 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche (307 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (165 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche (335 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (220 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara | 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | Suzuki | Chevrolet |
Model | Grand Vitara | Avalanche |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 307 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 335 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 117 L |