2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara (165 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (220 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Suzuki | Holden |
Model | Grand Vitara | Epica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 237 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |