2004 Suzuki Vitara vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki Vitara would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C70 weights approximately 425 kg more than 2004 Suzuki Vitara.
Because 2004 Suzuki Vitara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Vitara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C70 (350 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki Vitara. (220 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Suzuki Vitara | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
Model | Vitara | C70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1247 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |