2004 Suzuki XL7 vs. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee (225 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 67 kg more than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee (407 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Suzuki XL7 | 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Suzuki | Jeep |
Model | XL7 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2735 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1648 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 87 L |