2004 Suzuki XL7 vs. 2009 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2009 SsangYong Rexton. (161 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 2009 SsangYong Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 347 kg more than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Rexton (345 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2009 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Suzuki XL7 | 2009 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Suzuki | SsangYong |
Model | XL7 | Rexton |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 345 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 86.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 17.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 1972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 80 L |