2004 Suzuki XL7 vs. 2011 Ford Flex
To start off, 2011 Ford Flex is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Flex weights approximately 348 kg more than 2004 Suzuki XL7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Flex (336 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2011 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Suzuki XL7 | 2011 Ford Flex | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | XL7 | Flex |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 336 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2995 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |