2004 Suzuki XL7 vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2012 Audi A3.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A3 (280 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2012 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Suzuki XL7 | 2012 Audi A3 | |
Make | Suzuki | Audi |
Model | XL7 | A3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 280 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.8 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |