2004 Suzuki XL7 vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2012 Audi A6.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A6 (349 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2012 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Suzuki XL7 | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Suzuki | Audi |
Model | XL7 | A6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 349 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.8 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 75 L |